Height: 6'8.75"

Weight: 202.8

Wingspan: 7'0.5"

Position: SG/SF

Draft Age: 18.9

Class: 2025

League: NCAA

Team: Rutgers

Advanced

OBPM: 3.7

DBPM: 0.8

BPM: 4.5

WS/40: .112

Efficiency

TS%: .536

2P%: .511

3P%: .346

FT%: .692

FG%: .460

Strengths & Development Areas:

Catch & Shoot
Lateral Speed
Run & Jump
Creates Separation
Fluidity/Bending
Passing Accuracy

Model Output:

Original
3.87
No Impact
9.03
Positional
8.85
Humble
5.70
Pos Humble
7.13
Average
6.86

Film View:

Ace Bailey is one of the more polarizing players to watch.  He’s the epitome of a player where your evaluation can change if you are the type of person who looks for a prospects best moments and imagines what he could be if he could replicate those consistently…

Physically Similar NCAA Prospects:

(Based on Height / Wingspan / Weight, not on Playing Style / Skill / Ceiling)

Trey MurphyPeyton WatsonDevin Ebanks

Best Stats:

80th percentile Catch and Shoot, +16 On/Off

Ace can shoot.  And Rutgers was a mess of a team.  People (myself included) tend to give Dylan Harper more of the credit for being the bright spot in an otherwise poor Rutgers season, but the team was 16 points better with Ace on the floor and only about 7 points better with Harper on the floor (including worse defensively).

Worst Stats:

4.5 BPM, 42nd percentile in Isolation, 41st percentile as a P&R ball handler, 37th percentile shooting off the dribble

Bailey can shoot.  But like with Kon and Tre, the question is what else can he do to chart a path to a higher level role you are hoping for with a top 5-10 pick.  He’s not great at creating on his own.  He’s not great at running the two man game even with a screen to help him get a better matchup or get a step going downhill.  And he’s not great shooting off the dribble, partially because he struggles to get separation and get a clean look.  In case you were wondering, Jabari Smith Jr. who faced similar some questions coming into the draft was 71st percentile in Isolation, 54th percentile as a P&R ball handler (though on only 2% of his possessions, so not a fair comparison), and was 85th percentile shooting off the dribble.

Basically, Ace is behind even another player who faced similar questions that have led to some of his struggles in the NBA so far.

To be a star or to hit their ceiling:

First, his shot has to translate.  Then it really seems like a mix of finding a way to create more consistently, which given his shooting ability probably means using that as a primary weapon while improving his handle and mid-range game to help him get easier looks inside.  And then improving his feel and processing.  He certainly has the tools to be good on both ends, but he needs to be able to make better and quicker decisions.  Not necessarily easy and some players never get there.  But Ace doesn’t turn 19 until August, so certainly way too early to assume he’s a lost cause or can’t learn.

Verdict:

Ace is one of those wonderful players who is going to get a GM fired.  It’s just hard to say if it’s the GM who drafts him or one who passes on him.  I do always say there are sort of two ways of evaluating players and most people fall somewhere on the spectrum between the two extremes.  Either you prefer players who have demonstrated a good base of skills to improve on or you see the player at their best and project what could happen if they could develop the ability to perform that more consistently.  I tend to fall closer to the first camp.  I don’t love projects and that certainly leads to be being too low on some guys like LaVine, Jaylen Brown, and even to a much lesser degree Anthony Edwards (still had him high due to the draft, but basically said I’d begrudgingly draft him top 3).

So as you can imagine, I am not a big fan of Ace.  There have been plenty of players like Ben Simmons and Anthony Edwards who were very good players bad teams.  But I struggle to believe that 2 top 3 prospects couldn’t elevate even a mediocre NCAA team to a .500 record and an NIT appearance.  And I don’t love the idea of taking a player with poor feel and a lot of developmental holes in the top 5 of the draft (or even the top 7).  Additionally, he’s one of the stiffest players I’ve ever seen. Potentially has negative fluidity.  Which while I have no data on this, seems to be a real red flag the more I do this work. Finally, Ace really struggles to create any separation. He has the length and a nice enough jumper that was enough at times in college but it just feels like it’s going to be a much tougher task against NBA defenders.

With that said, there’s also no denying that Ace is very young, a great shooter, and has some of the highest upside in this class, so there is also so only so far you can let him slip.  The draft is a bit of a game of risk adjustment.  There are very few players who I would never draft, it’s just a question of what is their upside, their likelihood of reaching it, and the value of their position/archetype.  I might not like Ace at 3, I might feel sick to my stomach as I draft him at 7, but if he was still on the board at 15 I would be ecstatic to gamble on the upside versus taking someone “safe” given the draft is one of the few places a small market team in particular can really hit a home run.

So overall, I don’t want any part of Ace at 3.  I think there are several players I would roll the dice on before I get to him.  But at the risk of sounding like a broken record, this draft is a bit flatter and softer than some others.  So you really can’t let Ace slip too far either, you just have to be comfortable with the fact that the floor is really low, meaning he is probably best for a franchise with a very low talent level who doesn’t mind being back in the lottery next year or a team that has so much depth they don’t need another solid player and they can let Ace develop on their bench (if Houston hadn’t just traded their pick for Durant, that would have been a perfect spot).  Overall, I’d probably grit my teeth and take him somewhere in that 7-12 range and then hire a personal coach and hope we can develop him.

NBA Comp High:

Brandon Ingram or Rashard Lewis
Brandon Ingram or Rashard Lewis
I'll be honest, I put two partially because Ingram and Lewis are a bit different and reflect real upside depending on how Ace develops. And also because I have probably used Lewis 3-4 times now for any taller player who can shoot, but is less of a creator / passer as a primary skill. I don't want to be too one note, but hey, these types of players come along every couple of years. So no, I don't see Durant or Paul George for Ace. Durant is elite and always was. George is just far more athletic and was entering the league with far more skill. Either is generously a 1% outcome for him. Both Ingram and Lewis were more raw and took a couple of years. Lewis became really good at what he did and Ingram grew a bit more as a driver and facilitator. Bailey is young and if his processing catches up to some of his tools, he could take either path. I am not super bullish on him getting here, but it does seem realistic that if an 18 year old has things "click" and can grow, that these are achievable outcomes.

NBA Comp Medium:

Jabari Smith Jr.
Jabari Smith Jr.
I've tried to not let Jabari's slow start in the NBA cloud my judgement of Ace too much. But now that I am finalizing comps, I don't know how I can avoid him. Both were great college shooters (in fact Jabari as noted above was even better) who were stiff and struggled to create separation to drive and score inside. Both had really good defensive tools. And while Jabari's career is far from set in stone, he does reflect the challenges that Ace could face during his first few years in the league. It actually wouldn't surprise me if Ace struggles more.

NBA Comp Low:

Modern Anthony Randolph
Modern Anthony Randolph
Ok, so not completely fair, as Ace is a far better shooter, which is why I added the "modern" qualifier. Look, I almost said Kevin Knox; however, I chose Randolph for some other parallels. Both came from struggling NCAA teams and had people making excuses about the performance of their teams. Both were very toolsy players who struggled with actual production and had skill development gaps. And both were players who struggled with feel and processing. And Randolph was a lottery pick too (#14 overall by the Warriors in 2008). Now, I am betting the over here on Ace. But there's a very real lower outcome where Ace is just as tantalizing and just as frustrating. Randolph kicked around the league for 6 years and kept getting fans hopes up. Ace's shooting and generally better attitude should buy him more time, but this represents a realistic bottom in terms of playing for 4 different teams and never really sticking in a rotation.

Airious (Ace) Bailey Player Statistics

Per Game

Season GS MP FG FGA FG% 3P 3PA 3P% 2P 2PA 2P% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
2021-22 30 33.3 6.8 14.7 .460 1.6 4.5 .346 5.2 10.2 .511 2.5 3.6 .692 2.1 5.1 7.2 1.3 1.0 1.3 2.0 2.8 17.6

Totals

Season GS MP FG FGA FG% 3P 3PA 3P% 2P 2PA 2P% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
2021-22 30 1000 203 441 .460 47 136 .346 156 305 .511 74 107 .692 62 153 215 38 30 38 61 83 527

Per 40 Minutes

Season GS MP FG FGA FG% 3P 3PA 3P% 2P 2PA 2P% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
2021-22 30 1000 8.1 17.6 .460 1.9 5.4 .346 6.2 12.2 .511 3.0 4.3 .692 2.5 6.1 8.6 1.5 1.2 1.5 2.4 3.3 21.1

Advanced Stats

Season G MP PER TS% eFG% 3PAr FTr ORB% DRB% TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% OWS DWS WS WS/40 OBPM DBPM BPM
2021-22 30 1000 19.9 .536 .308 .243 7.0 17.5 12.2 8.3 1.7 4.1 11.0 27.5 1.7 1.1 2.8 .112 3.7 0.8 4.5
Airious (Ace) Bailey Expert Commentary
No expert commentary has been found for this player.
Airious (Ace) Bailey In The News
No posts have been found for this player.
Airious (Ace) Bailey Videos
No posts have been found for this player.
Create A Scouting Report For Airious (Ace) Bailey
Feel free to critique players in your scouting reports, but please keep your commentary respectful. Let’s make sure our community stays a positive and supportive space for basketball fans.
Website Development