Height: 6'6"

Weight: 190.4

Wingspan: 6'10.25"

Position: SG/SF

Draft Age: 19.3

Class: Freshman

League: NCAA

Team: Texas

Advanced

OBPM: 6.5

DBPM: 1.2

BPM: 7.7

WS/40: .145

Efficiency

TS%: .557

2P%: .449

3P%: .397

FT%: .871

FG%: .427

Strengths & Development Areas:

Catch & Shoot
Movement Shooter
Shoot Off The Dribble
Low Defensive Versatility
Defensive Rotations
Inside Touch

Model Output:

Original
4.04
No Impact
4.95
Positional
5.40
Humble
7.28
Pos Humble
7.76
Average
5.88

Film View:

Tre Johnson is potentially the most complete shooter in the draft class, but still needs to develop a number of other parts of his game to reach his ceiling.

Offense

Tre Johnson projects as one of the top pure shooters in the class. He…

Physically Similar NCAA Prospects:

(Based on Height / Wingspan / Weight, not on Playing Style / Skill / Ceiling)

Alec Burks Josh RichardsonAaron Wiggins

Best Stats:

80th percentile P&R ball handler, 84th percentile Catch and Shoot, 75th percentile Shooting off the dribble; 39.7% on threes, 87% FTs, 1.5 A/T, 6.5 OBPM

You can start to see an NBA profile here both for a role player and one with upside to do more.  Tre is an elite shooter, but more than just a ball dominant shooter, he can operate out of the P&R and he can also play off ball.  That is an intriguing profile.  And his passing is actually pretty good someone who is more of a shooter / scorer.

Worst Stats:

1.2 DPM, 1.1 steals + 0.3 blocks + 0.4 offensive rebounds per 40, 7 dunks (made 7 of 11 dunk attempts)

Tre’s defense was pretty bad and he was hunted in big games like the aforementioned Tennessee game from the film review.  If he’s being hunted in college and is a below average NBA defender, then he is going to need to be a special offensive player in order to avoid fighting a constant battle between providing enough offensive value in a game to avoid being a net negative due to his defense (e.g., Buddy Hield syndrome).

Additionally, his applied athleticism stats are pretty bad across the board.  1.1 steals is basically the minimum below which you start to worry, but the low blocks, offensive rebounds, and dunks is also a bit concerning.  I don’t think Tre is unathletic or can’t play in the NBA, but it does suggest some of his defensive struggles might be more than just effort or high usage.  Similarly his issues creating separation might be a struggle in the NBA.  Basically, his shot will need to be so elite that it creates driving lanes for him.

To be a star or to hit their ceiling:

His shot needs to translate at an elite level and he needs to continue improving his mid range shot enough that he can get inside because players are jumping at the treat of a jumper every time he nods or twitches.  And then he’ll need to get better at punishing teams for sending doubles at him by using some of his passing ability more and not developing tunnel vision.

Verdict:

This draft reminds me a bit of the 2020 draft, which had a sort of clear top two picks, Edwards and Ball (though I had Hali ranked up with them), and then a whole middle sludge of players who had some upside if you squinted right and were solid prospects, but also not really guys you loved as top 5-7 picks.  And ultimately aside from those top 2, the best players were taken at 12 (Haliburton), 21 (Maxey), 26 (Pritchard), and 30 (Bane).  Meanwhile, the rest of the Top 10 (Wiseman, Pat Williams, Okoro, Okongwu, Hayes, Toppin, and Jalen Smith) have just sort of been solid with some busts mixed in.

Why do I bring this up here?  Because this draft could be really similar.  After Flagg, Harper, and maybe VJ, there’s a whole lot of solid players or guys with soft floors where it wouldn’t surprise me if we look back in 5 years and several of the top players are guys taken later who aren’t really much worse prospects than the mid-lottery players.

And Tre is one of these odd players in that I like his profile and think he has a clear NBA role where the biggest question is if he’s another Buddy Hield or Cam Thomas or if he can develop into more of a Devin Booker type of player.  However, it’s a risk I would prefer to be taking a bit later in the lottery.  But due to the relative softness of the lottery after the first couple of players, Tre could very well find himself taken with a top 4-6 pick and honestly that is a bit scary.

There is always room in the league for shooters and scorers.  And given Tre’s success with the P&R in college, his ability to shoot off the dribble, and his plus passing skills (even if he can get tunnel vision), I like rolling the dice on him to see if he can be more of a focal point.  Given he is going to be drafted in the high lottery, he is almost certain to be given the keys to a team and get 90 touches a game and put up numbers.  But ultimately, if he’s on an actual good team, I think the question will be more if he can develop into a true secondary ball handler and passer playing off of a true superstar.  If he can add some bulk and improve his defense I think he has a real shot.

However, the floor for this type of player starts to sink really quickly.  If he’s not a true secondary ball handler and is more of a floor spacer with poor defense, he can still carve out a career, but his overall importance and value starts to drop quickly.  This is why ideally, you’d be taking Tre more in the 6-10 range, but I get the feeling given this year’s talent, he is likely to go Top 5 to a team lacking star talent and looking to hit a home run (which frankly describes a lot of lottery teams).  I think he has the chops beat his floor, but would wish I could grab him a bit lower.

NBA Comp High:

Tyler Herro
Tyler Herro
Yes, the easy one here is Devin Booker. However, Tre's build is more similar to Herro. And Booker's development was a bit of an outlier. Tre hit 45% of his twos and had his struggles inside, something Booker's always been a bit better at, but Herro's struggled with in the past. So yes, you can make a case that Booker represents a ceiling, but for a high end outcome I think Herro represents the type of player Johnson can become. Someone where the threat of his three point shot is what sets up his game. But who has the handles and passing ability to run an efficient offense. And then on defense… hey, let's put on some of those offensive highlights again, they were way more fun.

NBA Comp Medium:

Taller (Slightly Poorer Man's) CJ McCollum
Taller (Slightly Poorer Man's) CJ McCollum
This is arguably a bit optimistic for a middle scenario so I added the "slightly poorer" modifier, but I can see a lot of parallels in their games. CJ is a talented shooter and scorer who has been a plus starter for some good Blazers and Pelicans teams. He has good handles and mixed ability finishing inside. He's a decent passer, but has never been mistaken for a real point guard or someone teams rely on to create for others and he's always been at his best next to another lead guard. He's also been a career net negative on defense with a career -1.1 DBPM (but did see his OBPM peak as high as 5.0). CJ has never made the all star team or been in consideration for an All NBA team, but he's been a valuable NBA starter. I could see Tre carving out a career like this. Valuable offensive player with enough ancillary skills to avoid being a purely one-dimensional microwave scorer or shooter, but with enough weaknesses to limit his overall impact on winning.

NBA Comp Low:

Buddy Hield
Buddy Hield
Cam Thomas is more in vogue nowadays, but Buddy really had a couple of solid seasons for the Kings topping out as high as a 2.1 BPM in 2019. However, Buddy was the quintessential microwave scorer who was able to carry some games when his shooting was on. But who never really created for others and was always a net negative on defense. So there was constant pressure on his shooting and scoring to be good enough to make up for the rest of his game. And frankly, there's a limit to the type of role you want that kind of player to have on your team. I think Tre is too good of a shooter in a league that values shooting to be too bad. But if his defense and the rest of his offense don't really develop around his shooting, he could easily fall into the Buddy Hield / Cam Thomas archetype and be better off in a more limited role.

Tre Johnson Player Statistics

Per Game

Season GS MP FG FGA FG% 3P 3PA 3P% 2P 2PA 2P% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
2021-22 33 34.7 6.8 15.9 .427 2.7 6.8 .397 4.1 9.1 .449 3.7 4.2 .871 0.3 2.8 3.1 2.7 0.9 0.3 1.8 2.1 19.9

Totals

Season GS MP FG FGA FG% 3P 3PA 3P% 2P 2PA 2P% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
2021-22 33 1145 224 525 .427 89 224 .397 135 301 .449 121 139 .871 11 92 103 90 31 10 60 69 658

Per 40 Minutes

Season GS MP FG FGA FG% 3P 3PA 3P% 2P 2PA 2P% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
2021-22 33 1145 7.8 18.3 .427 3.1 7.8 .397 4.7 10.5 .449 4.2 4.9 .871 0.4 3.2 3.6 3.1 1.1 0.3 2.1 2.4 23.0

Advanced Stats

Season G MP PER TS% eFG% 3PAr FTr ORB% DRB% TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% OWS DWS WS WS/40 OBPM DBPM BPM
2021-22 33 1145 19.7 .557 .427 .265 1.1 9.0 5.2 16.5 1.6 1.0 9.2 29.1 3.0 1.1 4.2 .145 6.5 1.2 7.7
Tre Johnson Expert Commentary
No expert commentary has been found for this player.
Tre Johnson In The News
No posts have been found for this player.
Tre Johnson Videos
No posts have been found for this player.
Create A Scouting Report For Tre Johnson
Feel free to critique players in your scouting reports, but please keep your commentary respectful. Let’s make sure our community stays a positive and supportive space for basketball fans.
Website Development